Despite significant advances in Building Information Modeling (BIM) and increased adoption, numerous challenges remain. Discipline-specific BIM software tools with file storage have unresolved interoperability issues and do not capture or express interdisciplinary design intent. This hobbles machines ’ ability to process design information. The lack of suitable data representation hinders the application of machine learning and other data-centric applications in building design. We propose Building Information Graphs (BIGs) as an alternative modeling method. In BIGs, discipline-specific design models are compiled as subgraphs in which nodes and edges model objects and their relationships. Additional nodes and edges in a meta-graph link the building objects across subgraphs. Capturing both intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary relationships, BIGs provide a dimension of contextual data for capturing design intent and constraints. BIGs are designed for computation and applications. The explicit relationships enable advanced graph functionalities, such as across-domain change propagation and object-level version control.
| Authors | Unknown |
|---|---|
| Year | 2025 |
| Venue | Data-Centric Engineering |
| DOI | 10.1017/dce.2025.10024 |
| Source Database | EBSCO (Applied Science & Technology) |
| Bridge-to-GNN | Category Borderline |
| GNN Architecture | GraphSAGE (heuristic — verify) |
| Graph Encoding | Not yet extracted from PDF |
| AEC Task | Not yet extracted from PDF |
| Cohort | Mature Applications (2024–2026) |
| Implementation Framework | Revit / Dynamo, OWL / SPARQL (heuristic — verify) |
|---|---|
| Primary Metric | Accuracy (heuristic — verify) |
| Key Finding | Building Information Graphs (BIGs) as an alternative modeling method (heuristic — verify) |
| Quality Assessment | 2/6 · rigor: Low · Code/Data: ✓Baseline: ✓ (heuristic — verify) |
| GNN architectures detected | GraphSAGE / SAGEConv · GAT (Graph Attention) · Knowledge Graph Embedding (TransE/RotatE/DistMult) · GCN |
|---|---|
| Frameworks / libraries | Revit / Dynamo · ArchiCAD · RDF / OWL / SPARQL · OpenAI / GPT API |
| Benchmark datasets referenced | COLLAB |
| Code repositories found in text | https://github.com/features/copilot · https://github.com/pipauwel/IFCtoRDF |
| Quality (heuristic, 6-flag) | 3/6 · rigor: Medium Code/Data: ✓Benchmark: ✓Baseline: ✓CV/Split: —Ablation: —Reproducible: — |
Part of the GML/GNN in AEC Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020) — 112 papers, 2020–2026