Back to Wiki

[12] Training and evaluating a Co-pilot tool using graph neural networks for generating non-orthogonal building typologies in architectural autocompletion

EBSCO – Screened Structural Design & Layout Generation 2025

Paper Description extracted from PDF · abstract · 143 words

This study introduces a context-sensitive generative artificial intelligence (AI) co-pilot tool designed to assist architectural design by generating predictive suggestions based on Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) data. The approach adopted in this study involves the utilization of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Deep Generative Models of Graphs (DGMG) to enhance the synthesis of 3D architectural spatial typologies. To capture spatial and relational patterns between building elements, various GNN architectures where employed, including Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), GraphSAGE, and Graph Attention Networks (GATs). The custom training dataset comprised 180,000 subgraphs derived from realworld BIM models, with IFC files converted into heterogeneous graph representations. A combination of multi-label classification and regression techniques was applied to address the complexities of architectural design predictions. The developed co-pilot tool integrates these models within an interactive human-AI workflow, offering users different levels of control.

AuthorsRenner, Markus and Hornung, Matthias and Elshani, Diellza and Niepert, Mathias and Wortmann, Thomas
Year2025
VenueInternational Journal of Architectural Computing
DOI10.1177/14780771251354914
Source DatabaseEBSCO (Applied Science & Technology)
Bridge-to-GNNCategory A
GNN ArchitectureGraphSAGE (heuristic — verify)
Graph EncodingNot yet extracted from PDF
AEC TaskNot yet extracted from PDF
CohortMature Applications (2024–2026)

Extracted Methodology heuristic — verify before citing

Dataset Size22 models (heuristic — verify)
Implementation FrameworkDGL, Grasshopper / Rhino (heuristic — verify)
Key Hyperparameters45 epochs; batch size 64; lr 0.0001 (heuristic — verify)
Primary MetricAccuracy (heuristic — verify)
Primary Value16.67% (heuristic — verify)
Key Findingthree levels of human-AI interaction (heuristic — verify)
Quality Assessment2/6 · rigor: Low ·
Baseline: ✓CV/Split: ✓ (heuristic — verify)

Detected Technical Stack auto-detected from PDF · regex catalogue match

GNN architectures detectedGraphSAGE / SAGEConv · GAT (Graph Attention) · R-GCN (Relational GCN) · Graph Transformer / GraphGPS / SAN · EdgeConv · Graph GAN · Graph VAE / VGAE · Knowledge Graph Embedding (TransE/RotatE/DistMult) · GCN
Frameworks / librariesDeep Graph Library (DGL) · Grasshopper / Rhino · RDF / OWL / SPARQL · OpenAI / GPT API
Hyperparameters (regex-detected)epochs=20, 10, 45 · batch_size=64, 4 · learning_rate=0.001-0, 0.0001 · dropout=0.1, 0.0
Dataset stats found22 models
Reported metrics + valuesAccuracy: 16.67% · Accuracy: 79% · Accuracy: 71.14% · Precision: 70.79% · Precision: 71.14% · Recall: 70.52% · Recall: 71.14%
Quality (heuristic, 6-flag)3/6 · rigor: Medium
Code/Data: —Benchmark: —Baseline: ✓CV/Split: ✓Ablation: —Reproducible: ✓

Lineage Families

floorplan-generation llm-kg-hybrid

Enabled By / Precursors

[18] [53]

Extended By

None in corpus

Infrastructure Dependencies

Deep Graph Library (DGL) (detected from PDF) Grasshopper / Rhino (detected from PDF) RDF / OWL / SPARQL (detected from PDF) OpenAI / GPT API (detected from PDF)

Research Frontier Tags

explicit-gnn frontier-2025+

Part of the GML/GNN in AEC Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020) — 112 papers, 2020–2026