Back to Wiki

[44] Selected Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Risk Analysis of Damage to Masonry Buildings Subject to Long-Term Underground Mining Exploitation

EBSCO – Screened Construction Safety & Knowledge Management 2021

Paper Description extracted from PDF · abstract · 135 words

This paper presents an advanced computational approach to assess the risk of damage to masonry buildings subjected to negative kinematic impacts of underground mining exploitation. The research goals were achieved using selected tools from the area of artificial intelligence (AI) methods. Ultimately, two models of damage risk assessment were built using the Naive Bayes classifier (NBC) and Bayesian Networks (BN). The first model was used to compare results obtained using the more computationally advanced Bayesian network methodology. In the case of the Bayesian network, the unknown Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) structure was extracted using Chow-Liu’s Tree Augmented Naive Bayes (TAN-CL) algorithm. Thus, one of the methods involving Bayesian Network Structure Learning from data (BNSL) was implemented. The application of this approach represents a novel scientific contribution in the interdisciplinary field of mining and civil engineering.

AuthorsChomacki, Leszek and Rusek, Janusz and Słowik, Leszek
Year2021
VenueMinerals (2075-163X)
DOI10.3390/min11090958
Source DatabaseEBSCO (Academic Search Ultimate)
Bridge-to-GNNCategory Borderline
GNN ArchitectureNot yet extracted from PDF
Graph EncodingNot yet extracted from PDF
AEC TaskNot yet extracted from PDF
CohortEarly Infrastructure (2020–2021)

Extracted Methodology heuristic — verify before citing

Dataset Size207 buildings (heuristic — verify)
Primary MetricAccuracy (heuristic — verify)
Primary Value83.89% (heuristic — verify)
Key Findingadvanced computational approach to assess the risk of damage to masonry buildings subjected to negative kinematic impacts of underground mining exploitation (heuristic — verify)
Quality Assessment3/6 · rigor: Medium ·
Benchmark: ✓Baseline: ✓CV/Split: ✓ (heuristic — verify)

Detected Technical Stack auto-detected from PDF · regex catalogue match

GNN architectures detectedKnowledge Graph Embedding (TransE/RotatE/DistMult)
Benchmark datasets referencedPubMed
Dataset stats found207 buildings
Reported metrics + valuesAccuracy: 83.89% · Accuracy: 75.86% · Accuracy: 87.07%
Quality (heuristic, 6-flag)1/6 · rigor: Low
Code/Data: —Benchmark: ✓Baseline: —CV/Split: —Ablation: —Reproducible: —

Lineage Families

safety-km

Enabled By / Precursors

[28]

Extended By

None in corpus

Infrastructure Dependencies

None

Research Frontier Tags

graph-ml-aec

Part of the GML/GNN in AEC Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020) — 112 papers, 2020–2026